As always, well argued, Michael. And I agree with it.
However, I do have a problem with the idea that anything produced on or by the earth is merely a 'resource' - equitably shared or not. In my view, the very use of the word promotes a human perspective that is objectifying and exploitative per se, whatever the harvest and whether or not the harvesting and distribution is ethically carried out.
So while I share your perspective, I think the way we use language is an important factor in how we relate to the other-than-human. We need a word that encompasses respect, compassion, empathy and gratitude for abundance, maybe?
Thank you for taking the time to comment Roselle. I agree that language is important. Resources are sustaining 'gifts' for all life in my view. Maybe we could craft a presentation around that type of definition?
And thanks for taking the time to respond! My own sense is that our culture in general (not you) tends to see anything here on the earth as a 'resource' for us. To me, culturally and ethically, that concept allows us to dissociate from other lives, in order to use them.
My own work now, personal and professional, is dedicated to campaigning for a different relationship altogether to the other-than-human/more-than-human world. I know you too relate to that, and to moving away from the anthropocentric.
As always, well argued, Michael. And I agree with it.
However, I do have a problem with the idea that anything produced on or by the earth is merely a 'resource' - equitably shared or not. In my view, the very use of the word promotes a human perspective that is objectifying and exploitative per se, whatever the harvest and whether or not the harvesting and distribution is ethically carried out.
So while I share your perspective, I think the way we use language is an important factor in how we relate to the other-than-human. We need a word that encompasses respect, compassion, empathy and gratitude for abundance, maybe?
Thank you for taking the time to comment Roselle. I agree that language is important. Resources are sustaining 'gifts' for all life in my view. Maybe we could craft a presentation around that type of definition?
Hello again Michael
And thanks for taking the time to respond! My own sense is that our culture in general (not you) tends to see anything here on the earth as a 'resource' for us. To me, culturally and ethically, that concept allows us to dissociate from other lives, in order to use them.
My own work now, personal and professional, is dedicated to campaigning for a different relationship altogether to the other-than-human/more-than-human world. I know you too relate to that, and to moving away from the anthropocentric.
Tell me more about 'crafting a presentation'?